Another random thought about Episode III
Jul. 12th, 2005 07:37 amYes, it's a given fact that if you are over the age of seven, you have an issue with Jar Jar Binks. Thankfully, Lucas abbrieviated his appearances in Episode III to a mere background character. (Hey, Georgie boy, we owe ye one for that!).
This gets me thinking...(
tripartite will definitely wonder if I'm firing on all thrusters now)
Firstly, was there a *need* for Jar Jar in The Phantom Menace? Comic relief is a nice touch when used properly; I think we can all agree on that, but I didn't find Jar Jar to be remotely cute, funny or necessary. This leaves me wondering who could have been thrown into the mix as the perfect sidekick.
( Read more... )
This gets me thinking...(
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Firstly, was there a *need* for Jar Jar in The Phantom Menace? Comic relief is a nice touch when used properly; I think we can all agree on that, but I didn't find Jar Jar to be remotely cute, funny or necessary. This leaves me wondering who could have been thrown into the mix as the perfect sidekick.
( Read more... )